Health
costs rising faster than incomes, study says
WASHINGTON -- Health insurance premiums paid by U.S. workers have
risen nearly three times faster than average earnings since 2000,
eroding the income of average Americans, a study based on federal
data shows.
Premium
costs for private health insurance coverage are projected to have
grown 35.9% from 2000 through the end of 2004. Average individual
earnings grew 12.4%, the study found.
The
findings are from an analysis conducted by the Lewin Group, a
private health economics consulting firm, for Families USA, a
consumer-oriented health advocacy group that has supported Democratic
presidential candidate John Kerry's health care proposals.
The
findings are similar to those of other non-partisan groups, such
as the Kaiser Family Foundation, and government agencies, including
the Commerce Department.
The
study, which is being released today, found that as health premiums
consume a growing share of earnings, more Americans are spending
a major portion of their annual incomes on health care. During
the period studied, the number of Americans whose health care
costs exceed one-fourth of their earnings rose to 14.3 million
from 11.6 million, the study concludes.
Lewin
used its computer economic models of the U.S. health care system
to analyze data from the Census Bureau, the Labor Department and
federal health care agencies.
The
study was conducted in an attempt to pose and answer a version
of President Reagan's memorable 1980 campaign question: Are you
better off now than four years ago? The findings are certain to
be used by Democrats to argue that average Americans have fallen
behind economically under President Bush's administration and
that any benefits Bush's tax cuts delivered to working families
have been lost.
''These
grim findings explain why health care costs and coverage have
become a top-priority concern for America's families over the
past four years,'' the Families USA report says.
But
Bill Pierce, spokesman for Health and Human Services Secretary
Tommy Thompson, challenged the credibility of Families USA and
defended the administration's record on health care.
Pierce
said the group is ''not objective'' because of ties to the Kerry
campaign. Pierce said Bush ''led the most significant change in
health care in this country'' with enactment of a Medicare prescription
benefit last December.
Key
points made by the study:
*
In 26 states, workers' premium costs rose by more than 40%. The
average premium amount paid by workers for family coverage rose
from $1,433 to $1,947.
*
The share of health premiums paid by employers rose 31.8%. The
share of employer-paid premiums for family coverage went from
$5,595 to $7,373.
The
findings document a trend of rising costs and shrinking benefits.
In an attempt to control premiums, some companies have increased
co-payments, scaled back benefits and are imposing surcharges
on workers who sign up for family benefits when their spouses
are eligible for health coverage through another employer.
Those
increased premiums and co-payments have contributed to a rising
number of Americans confronting what economists call catastrophic
health care costs.
Of
the 14.3 million Americans younger than 65 whose health care costs
are estimated at more than one-quarter of their earnings in 2004,
the study found, a majority of those had health insurance coverage.
The
number of insured Americans facing health care costs in excess
of 25% of their earnings rose from 8.4 million to 10.7 million
from 2000 to 2004, according to the report .
The
report said overall increases in health care costs, including
payments to hospitals and doctors and the cost of prescription
drugs, are the main forces driving the rise in private insurance
premiums. But it said the rising number of Americans without health
insurance is a contributing factor, because costs of treating
the uninsured who are not covered by government programs are passed
along to others.
To
see more of USAToday.com, or to subscribe, go to http://www.usatoday.com
©
Copyright 2004 USA TODAY, a division of Gannett Co. Inc.
Disclamer: References or links to other sites from WellnessDeluxe.com
does not constitute recommendation or endorsement by Wellness.com.
We bear no responsibility for the content of websites other than
Wellnessdeluxe.com
Wellness
::: Vital ::: Wellness
::: Vital ::: Wellness
|